[Saurav ChandaParticipant]

Thank you Damian…

[Saurav ChandaParticipant]

Hello Miguel, I have gone through all the parameters of the attached file and I found out that in profiles and materials the 2D profile defination should be same as that of 3D. Even the material should be same in wafer properties. You can just check it out.

Regards,
Sourav

[Saurav ChandaParticipant]

Hello Himadri, Well are you using optiFDTD to simulate your structure or some other software. Attach the structure so that I get to know.

Regards,
Sourav

[Saurav ChandaParticipant]

Hi Harikiranjeet, as far the difference is concerned they are different in geometrical shape and also with respect to irreduicable Brillouin zone along the k vector path. Simulation is you have to choose what type of crystal you want and accordingly create the defect to create any sort of waveguide. Well I would say the hexagonal arrangement is much better for propagation of modes and output power is significantly better and thus the loss is.

Thank you

[Saurav ChandaParticipant]

Thanks again. But hey Ravil have you got any book with you named -“Photonic Crystals, Theory, Applications and Fabrication by Dennis W PratherC”. If so can you just attach the pdf file.

[Saurav ChandaParticipant]

Thank you Ravil & Damian. It simply worked.

[Saurav ChandaParticipant]

Is area detector = observation point in optiFDTD?

[Saurav ChandaParticipant]

Hi esakkimuthu,I hope there is no such option only you can vary the power level thats it.

[Saurav ChandaParticipant]

Any idea please forward.

[Saurav ChandaParticipant]

Hello Perveen, I was busy a bit so couldn’t catch you. So what all are the problems which you are facing? You can mail me at souravchanda72@gmail.com.

Thank you

[Saurav ChandaParticipant]

Under the FDTD-Nonlinear folder right click and create a new Material. From there you can choose whether it is a 2nd, 3rd, Kerr … type material. Since you only have the nonlinear index that means to me that you would be making a 3rd order material. You then just need to convert the index to a susceptibility. You can find the calculation on the web.

Regards

[Saurav ChandaParticipant]

Hi Aurelien,
Yes you can check the paper “PHYSICAL REVIEW B VOLUME 60, NUMBER 8 15 AUGUST 1999”. Here I am attaching an image file, you can check it out.

Thanking you
Sourav

Attachments:

1. 

   Untitled.jpg
   

[Saurav ChandaParticipant]

Great.

[Saurav ChandaParticipant]

Thank you Bryan.

[Saurav ChandaParticipant]

Yes you got it.