Base
Full Name | MUKESH KUMAR GUPTA |
Organization | MALAVIYA NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY , JAIPUR |
Job Title | RESEARCH SCHOLAR |
Forum Replies Created
hello all
Please need some help. here i attached image of setup file of optisystem 13 by comparison of APD or PIN receiver sensitivity analysis. here I got
for APD received power -28.95 dBm at BER 10-10 (Q=6)
for PIN received power -35.45 dBm at BER 10-10 (Q=6)
As per my analysis in above result PIN Receiver showing good sensitivity then APD but most research artical shows APD has good sensitivity then PIN. please verify my statements.
Attachments:
hello all
Please need some help. here i attached osd file of optisystem 13 by comparison of APD or PIN receiver sensitivity analysis. here I got
for APD received power -28.95 dBm at BER 10-10 (Q=6)
for PIN received power -35.45 dBm at BER 10-10 (Q=6)
As per my analysis in above result PIN Receiver showing good sensitivity then APD but most research artical shows APD has good sensitivity then PIN. please verify my statements.
According ur snapshot data i am getting two different values of Q factor PIN (60.11) or APD (4.71) not same …after changing PRBS sequence 4096. Q factor value should be same …
can i get evolution licence software till we get upgraded software pack .. @ optiwave technical support
can i upgrade from optiwave website
till now our institute didnt receive the latest version. we already recevied mail that it is dispatched …form side of optiwave
this file is not open in optisystem 13. please suggest any idea so i can open this…
thanks for response
this attached file form optiwave sample folder ..they show that APD is better than PIN but actully not like this. i try to take data from suggested paper but not able to find result . always finding that PIN has better performance . can u help me further that which data help to improve APD sensivity compare to PIN.