[Man Mohan GuptaParticipant]

Dear Scott

Thanks for all your responses and suggestions. Problem is fixed now.

Thanks

Regards

Man Mohan Gupta

[Man Mohan GuptaParticipant]

Dear Scott

Thanks for all your responses and suggestions. Problem is fixed now.

Thanks

Regards

Man Mohan Gupta

[Man Mohan GuptaParticipant]

Dear Scott

Thanks It works.

How can we extract the data of power spectrum of observational lines for manual calculation of Normalized transmission?

Thanks

Regards

Man Mohan

[Man Mohan GuptaParticipant]

Dear Scott

Thanks It works.

How can we extract the data of power spectrum of observational lines for manual calculation of Normalized transmission?

Thanks

Regards

Man Mohan

[Man Mohan GuptaParticipant]

Dear Scott

Thanks

Can you let us know that what value to be chosen for the width of the gaussian pulse in order to get the normalized transmission 1? What is the criteria to select the width of the gaussian pulse?

Thanks and regards

Man Mohan Gupta

[Man Mohan GuptaParticipant]

Dear Scott

Thanks

Can you let us know that what value to be chosen for the width of the gaussian pulse in order to get the normalized transmission 1? What is the criteria to select the width of the gaussian pulse?

Thanks and regards

Man Mohan Gupta

[Man Mohan GuptaParticipant]

Dear Scott,

As per your suggestion, I have run the simulation for sufficiently long time. Maximum output transmission obtained for the design is 0.52 only. It is ideally to be 1 at resonant wavelength.

I am attaching the time response and normalized transmission spectrum of the design.

Thanking You

Regard

Man Mohan Gupta

[Man Mohan GuptaParticipant]

Dear Scott,

As per your suggestion, I have run the simulation for sufficiently long time. Maximum output transmission obtained for the design is 0.52 only. It is ideally to be 1 at resonant wavelength.

I am attaching the time response and normalized transmission spectrum of the design.

Thanking You

Regard

Man Mohan Gupta

[Man Mohan GuptaParticipant]

Dear Scott

Thanks for for valuable comments and suggestions.

1. Sir, should we then ignore negative sign and only pick the magnitude of power recorded by observational line if line is recording the signal propagating in negative direction?

Thanking You

Regards

Man Mohan Gupta

[Man Mohan GuptaParticipant]

Dear Scott

Thanks for for valuable comments and suggestions.

1. Sir, should we then ignore negative sign and only pick the magnitude of power recorded by observational line if line is recording the signal propagating in negative direction?

Thanking You

Regards

Man Mohan Gupta

[Man Mohan GuptaParticipant]

Thanks

Dear Scott

With your suggestions, problem of error message has been solved.

Thanking you very much for your support

Regards

Dr Man Mohan Gupta

[Man Mohan GuptaParticipant]

Thanks

Dear Scott

With your suggestions, problem of error message has been solved.

Thanking you very much for your support

Regards

Dr Man Mohan Gupta

[Man Mohan GuptaParticipant]

Hi
Dear Scott

Thanks for your response.

Listed below are the answer of questions raised by you to resolve my queries.

Can you confirm for me what version of the product you are using?
OptiFDTD 32-bit ver. 12.0.0.611

Can you confirm that this error is occuring within OptiFDTD Designer when you edit the input plane and NOT within OptiFDTD Analyzer after a simulation is run.

Yes, this error is appearing only occuring within Optifdtd Designer when I edit input plane. It does not appear within Optifdtd Analyzer after simulation completion.

I wish to add at this point that now if I allow simulation to run only for default number of time steps in simulation parameter window, error message does not appear. In order to get more precise results I wish to run the simulations for longer time. For this purpose I tick on “Run Until user stops Execution, then finalize results” in simulation parameter window. But with this setting error appears in the design file when click on launch plane. How can we fix this error if wish to run simulation for desired number of time steps?

Is it possible for you to provide me with the sequence of changes you make that will trigger that warning on this design.
I set the Half width to 1.5 um under 2D transverse Tab of input. Central wavelength of the pulse is taken to 1.5 um.

Kindly comment

Thanks

Dr. man mohan gupta

[Man Mohan GuptaParticipant]

Hi
Dear Scott

Thanks for your response.

Listed below are the answer of questions raised by you to resolve my queries.

Can you confirm for me what version of the product you are using?
OptiFDTD 32-bit ver. 12.0.0.611

Can you confirm that this error is occuring within OptiFDTD Designer when you edit the input plane and NOT within OptiFDTD Analyzer after a simulation is run.

Yes, this error is appearing only occuring within Optifdtd Designer when I edit input plane. It does not appear within Optifdtd Analyzer after simulation completion.

I wish to add at this point that now if I allow simulation to run only for default number of time steps in simulation parameter window, error message does not appear. In order to get more precise results I wish to run the simulations for longer time. For this purpose I tick on “Run Until user stops Execution, then finalize results” in simulation parameter window. But with this setting error appears in the design file when click on launch plane. How can we fix this error if wish to run simulation for desired number of time steps?

Is it possible for you to provide me with the sequence of changes you make that will trigger that warning on this design.
I set the Half width to 1.5 um under 2D transverse Tab of input. Central wavelength of the pulse is taken to 1.5 um.

Kindly comment

Thanks

Dr. man mohan gupta