Base
Full Name | FAYIQA NAQSHBANDI |
Organization | jammu university |
Job Title | student |
Country |
Forum Replies Created
HI RAHUL..
I want to mention here that it is not always true.. Your results may vary even after disabling the random seed.. But i can say that they won’t vary to the extent they used to.. I suggest you to try this first and keep checking the results accordingly. I hope this will help you..
Regards
HI DEEAPAK..
You are welcome Deepak
Regards
Hopefully this will surely help.
Regards
HI DEEPAk..
Hope this has helped you.
Regards
HI GAURAV..
I agree with manoj that the cut-off frequency of any low-pass filter depends on internal resistance and its capacitance…
Regards
HI RAJGURU..
Thank you for the vauable information..It is helpful indeed.
Regards
HI ALL..
This discussion was helpful.. I got some points due to which i was confused.. Really thankful to all.
Regards
HELLO SYED..
I would suggest you to go through the co-simulation tutorial on the optiwave website.. That will surely give you some idea..I will try to post the link as well.
Regards
HELLO POOJA..
I am a bit confused with what you have stated.. As we know noise is inevitable…Any system can’t be noise free ( negligible noise is present in most ideal systems as well).. Now as far as your query is concerned , i would like to share that variation in results may not be just because of noise..There are number of other factors as well like changing launching power, pulse broadening etc.. I hope you understand.
Regards
HI POOJA..
I agree to most of what other members have already mentioned..I would add that the application of buffer selector can be more application specific..I hoe that would help you…
Regards
HELLO RAJGURU..
Thank you for this valuable information..This helped me..Thank you again.
Regards
HI SHAFEEN..
You are welcome anytime..
Regards
HI DEEPAK..
You are welcome anytime..
Regards
HELLO RAJGURU..
Actually i would disagree here..I think sensitivity is more important in terms of simulation..I hope you would agree..
Regards